LD-LI
A permanent identifier
Every court, case, decision, statute, version, file and person gets an identifier of its own that never changes and is never reused.
Legislation · Case law · Court records · Research · Screening
The widest record of legislation, judgments and court records ever assembled, catalogued to our own standards — and an autonomous research system that reads all of it, compares legal systems and cites every source.

01The platform
The world’s largest legal corpus.
Every archive holds the supreme courts. The record that decides most matters is written further down — in district courts, courts of appeal and the tribunals most archives never reach: tax and customs, labour and social security, patents, housing and land, markets and competition, the disciplinary boards of the professions, military courts and the religious courts.
02Coverage
Part of our actual coverage, not all of it.
03Cataloguing
LexDino’s proprietary cataloguing system indexes everything in the record before it can be searched, compared or cited — legislation, judgments and court records alike.
LD-LI
Every court, case, decision, statute, version, file and person gets an identifier of its own that never changes and is never reused.
LD-ULDM
Case law and legislation in one model. Legislation and regulation in their layers, with the consolidated text and the text exactly as it stood in force on any given date.
LD-GEO
A map of territorial jurisdiction for every kind of court system, worldwide, from the national level down to the locality.
04Research
An autonomous research system that reads every judgment, statute and court record we hold, works through a question the way a researcher would, compares how similar legal systems have decided it, and cites the source of every sentence.
In several legal systems, yes. The Supreme Court of the Netherlands upheld an order requiring the State to cut emissions by at least 25% by the end of 2020, against 1990 levels1. Germany’s Federal Constitutional Court held the Federal Climate Change Act incompatible with fundamental rights for failing to set out reductions after 20302. The European Court of Human Rights found that Switzerland had violated Article 8 of the Convention by failing to put an adequate framework in place3.
05Screening
KYC and KYB against sanctions lists, politically exposed persons, watchlists and blacklists, adverse media, enforcement actions, ownership and the court record — in one search, with the source of every finding.
06Solutions
For companies that build practice-management and legal software: the record, screening and research inside your product, under your name.
The APIFor ministries, parliaments, courts and regulators: research across comparable legal systems, in a deployment you govern.
For governmentThe record and the research system inside your network — with a LexDino engineer on site to integrate, adapt and train.
On-premises07Contact sales
Tell us what you need to know. We will show you where it is written.
Thank you.
Your message has reached our team. We will reply by email.